4 min read

Celigo strengthens its security and compliance foundation for the AI era

Q: Is Celigo pursuing AI-specific certification?

Yes. Celigo is pursuing ISO/IEC 42001 certification, the international standard for AI management systems, alongside ISO/IEC 27001 for information security management.

Published Aug 21, 2026

Jessica Mifflin

Trust is earned, not assumed. It’s a principle we hold ourselves to at Celigo, and one that matters more than ever now. Security has always been core to the job of an integration platform as a service (iPaaS) running mission-critical operations, and it’s being further reshaped by AI.

We’re proud to share three milestones in that ongoing work: Celigo has completed our SOC 2 Type 2 audit, covering both our core integration platform and CloudExtend, and a SOC 1 Type 2 audit for our integration platform. Together, these independent attestations confirm that our security, availability, and financial-reporting-relevant controls aren’t just well-designed on paper but they also operate effectively day in and day out.

Why now, and why it matters

Security is table stakes. Financial control assurance is the next level.

Most vendors in our space can point to a SOC 2 report. Fewer can point to a SOC 1 Type 2, an attestation that speaks directly to the finance and audit teams who depend on Celigo to move financial data accurately and reliably across their systems of record. Achieving it alongside an expanded SOC 2 scope reflects something we think is worth saying out loud: we’re not standing still on compliance while everything else about our business accelerates.

And a lot is accelerating. As Celigo doubles down on AI capabilities across our platform, the security landscape we’re responsible for is expanding right alongside it: new data flows, new access patterns, new categories of risk that didn’t exist in the same form even two years ago.

“AI workflow security is where a lot of that new risk shows up first,” said Amy Farrow, Chief Information Officer at Celigo. “The vendors that earn lasting trust in this next phase of AI adoption are the ones who treat integration platform security as foundational, not bolted on after the fact.”

We believe the companies that will earn lasting trust in this new AI landscape are the ones investing in security and governance ahead of that curve, not catching up to it after the fact. That’s part of why we’re also pursuing ISO/IEC 42001 certification for our AI Management System, alongside ISO/IEC 27001, extending the same rigor to how we govern AI specifically.

Security you can see the effects of, not just the paperwork

Compliance reports are a snapshot of controls working as designed. But the real test of a security program is what it catches in practice, day to day, before it becomes a story anyone has to tell.

That’s the layer most customers don’t see: the phishing-resistant email defenses that strip malicious attachments and links before they ever reach an inbox. The cloud threat detection that flags anomalous activity in the AWS environment in near real time. The continuous monitoring across the Google Workspace environment that catches unusual access patterns as they happen, not after the fact.

That’s true for integration platform security at the infrastructure level, too. Rather than relying on periodic, point-in-time scans, we continuously scan our code and production environments for vulnerabilities. Issues are surfaced as they emerge, not weeks later on a fixed schedule. We pair that with continuous cloud security posture management (CSPM), which watches our cloud environment around the clock for misconfigurations before they can become exposures.

It’s a simple idea with an important implication: security isn’t a periodic check-in at Celigo, it’s a constant state. That’s the same posture our SOC 2 Type 2 report just independently verified, providing proof that these controls aren’t just running, they’re working.

What this means for our customers

For the teams that rely on Celigo: Security, IT, Operations, Finance, and Audit alike, this isn’t just a compliance checkbox. It’s independently verified assurance that the platform moving your most sensitive data and financial workflows is held to a standard that keeps pace with how fast this landscape is changing.

We’ll keep raising that bar. Reach out to your Celigo team or visit our Trust Center to request our SOC 2 Type 2 or SOC 1 Type 2 reports.

Jessica Mifflin is Senior Director of Cybersecurity & Compliance at Celigo, where she leads the company’s security, compliance, and risk programs.

What is an iPaaS, and is Celigo one?

+ −

An iPaaS (integration platform as a service) connects applications, data, and workflows across a business’s systems, often including automation and AI-powered capabilities. Because an iPaaS sits at the center of a company’s most sensitive data flows, iPaaS security and integration platform security are core evaluation criteria for any provider. Celigo is an integration and automation platform used by IT, finance, and operations teams to connect and automate business-critical processes.

What is SOC 2 Type 2, and is Celigo SOC 2 compliant?

+ −

SOC 2 Type 2 is an independent audit that verifies a company’s security, availability, and confidentiality controls operate effectively over a sustained period, not just at a single point in time. Celigo has completed its SOC 2 Type 2 audit, covering both the core Celigo integration platform and CloudExtend.

What is SOC 1 Type 2, and why does it matter?

+ −

SOC 1 Type 2 is an audit focused on controls relevant to financial reporting. It matters most to finance and audit teams who need assurance that a vendor moves and processes financial data accurately and reliably. Celigo has recently completed a SOC 1 Type 2 audit, covering our integration platform.

What's the difference between SOC 1 and SOC 2?

+ −

SOC 1 focuses on controls relevant to a customer’s financial reporting (internal controls over financial reporting, or ICFR). SOC 2 focuses more broadly on security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. Many vendors have a SOC 2 report; fewer also have a SOC 1 Type 2.